Only a third of the public ‘would probably eat’ artificial meat grown in a laboratory
Much has been made of the advancements in lab-grown meat as a means of meeting the rising demand for meat products. Indeed, the industry has attracted support famous philanthropists such as Bill Gates and Richard Branson, who believe that cultivating such products can reduce the negative impacts to the environment, animal welfare and human health that arise as a result of conventional meat production.
New YouGov research reveals what the public really think about artificial meat. The research finds that some consumers see benefits from the technology, recognizing its potential to tackle the ethical and environmental problems meat production poses. The most widely-perceived advantages are that it prevents the killing of animals (36% believe this to be the case), it contributes to greater food security (34%) and it has the potential to end world hunger (31%).
However, the public do have some concerns, most notably about the potential side-effects of artificial meat. Nearly two thirds of consumers (62%) are worried about this and 39% are concerned that it could be dangerous. Some also object to the fundamental principles behind its development; 49% worry that it’s simply not natural.
Women are more undecided on artificial meat than men
Four in ten Indonesian adults (42%) say they ‘would probably not eat’ artificial meat when asked to imagine it was available commercially. A third (33%) ‘probably would eat’ the meat, while a further 25% haven’t made up their mind.
Women are more undecided than men when it comes to eating artificial meat. While four-fifths of men (80%) have firm convictions either way, just two-thirds (69%) of women say the same.
Vietnamese consumers are the most open to eating artificial meat
Compared to the wider region, Indonesians are broadly in line with others in the Asia-Pacific who say they would probably eat artificial meat (33% of Indonesians say they would, compared to a regional average of 32%). Vietnamese consumers are the most likely to say they would try it (52% say as much), followed by Thai (34%) consumers. By contrast, just a quarter of Malaysian (25%) and Chinese (26%) consumers say the same; the lowest out of the nine countries surveyed.
Commenting on the findings, YouGov’s Head of Omnibus, Jake Gammon, said, “Pioneers of artificial meat have been working hard to drive production costs down to make such products more accessible to consumers. However, this research suggests that there is one final hurdle that manufacturers still need to tackle… consumer demand. Despite widespread exposure, consumers still appear sceptical about artificial meat. Unless they have their fears assuaged and are clearer on the potential benefits of such technology it will be an uphill struggle for producers ahead.”
*Data was collected online by YouGov Omnibus between 5 and 12 December 2017 among 1,002 respondents in Indonesia. Results are representative of the adult population.
Photo source: Getty Image